Reparations and Peacebuilding: two words that seem unrelated. Many think Reparations only relates to things that happened “back then.” And that peacebuilding only relates to things happening “over there.” But both are a significant part of building healthy and just societies. And if we bring them together, we can see they are deeply interrelated. Peacebuilding offers a few frames to help us further explore the work of Reparations.
But first, what is peacebuilding? And, even more basically, what is “peace”? In the context of peacebuilding, peace is much deeper than calm and quiet. It is thriving societies that have their needs met; it is just, equitable structures; it is healthy relationships; and it is communities that know how to move through conflict. This is known as positive peace.
Peacebuilding, then, is anything that helps us build positive peace. This includes Reparations. Robert Turner describes Reparations as “repair or redress of an offense. It is society’s way of atoning for things it has done and correcting the damage that is still present, even if the damaging acts may have ceased.” The United States has a history built on genocide, enslavement, and discrimination. This makes Reparations essential to building peace, and the frames below will help show its key role.
Frame 1: A Long View of Time
Peacebuilding situates conflicts in an expansive view of time. Conflict issues and violence do not arise out of nowhere. They usually build over time, sometimes over the course of generations. Many say of Reparations, “Well that was in the past, why are we talking about it now?” Peacebuilding reminds us that it is important to understand the past so that we can understand the present.
Isabel Wilkerson uses the metaphor of an old house to show the impact of the past on the present. She writes:
“America is an old house. We can never declare the work over… The owner of an old house knows that whatever you are ignoring will never go away. Whatever is lurking will fester whether you choose to look or not. Ignorance is no protection from the consequences of inaction… We are the heirs to whatever is right or wrong with it… And any further deterioration is, in fact, on our hands.”
If we do not truly know the past and refuse to acknowledge and repair it, we will not be able to heal it at its roots. As Robert Turner writes in Creating a Culture of Repair, “Reparations are about the impact that four hundred years of ‘back then’ still have on Black Americans today.” Reparations is one way to address the harms of past and present so we do not continue them into the future.
Frame 2: Definitions of Violence
Peacebuilding also shows the importance of Reparations by defining different types of violence. A model often used in peacebuilding is Johan Galtung’s violence triangle. It is divided into direct and indirect violence.
Direct violence is what we often think of as violence: harm that is physical and immediate.
Indirect violence, on the other hand, is more diffuse. It is carried out indirectly by many people at once and often impacts people slowly over time. Two types of indirect violence are structural violence and cultural violence.
Structural violence refers to inequalities that alienate people from their inalienable rights. Cultural violence refers to any beliefs that justify other kinds of violence.
Some examples:
Direct Violence: police brutality, mass shootings, assault
Structural Violence: redlining, environmental racism, the Chinese Exclusion Act
Cultural Violence: white supremacy, misogyny, American exceptionalism
How we determine what “counts” as violence determines how we count what is worthy of Reparations- what is worthy of repair and making right. It expands our vision of how we measure a “peaceful” society. When structural and cultural violence are entrenched, peace is not truly present.
Frame 3: Conditions for Healing: The Importance of Remembering and Truth-Telling
Remembering and truth-telling after harm are important for both Reparations and Peacebuilding. Judith Herman describes this when she writes,
“The ordinary response to atrocities is to banish them from consciousness… Atrocities, however, refuse to be buried. Equally as powerful as the desire to deny atrocities is the conviction that denial does not work… Remembering and telling the truth about terrible events are prerequisites both for the restoration of the social order and for the healing of individual victims.”
Through its essence, Reparations includes a commitment to remembering and truth-telling. It is built on the acknowledgement of harm caused. And it takes us one step farther than remembering toward being part of repairing the harm.
Peacebuilding reminds us that healing will not be possible without addressing the wrongs and wounds of the past. This is especially true when those wrongs are ongoing and the wounds are continually reopened. Reparations is one important path we take toward healing.
Peacebuilding does not prescribe one approach or answer to violence and conflict. Instead, it is a set of values and tools that can help us generate creative responses to harm. Both Reparations and peacebuilding come face-to-face with violence in order to move toward repair. And both Reparations and peacebuilding have the potential to be as expansive and creative as we can imagine. We can use these frames to better understand the past, engage the present, and help end cycles of violence. Together, we can imagine the future while we repair and build.